Nominee's Key Links:
Bio: https://ehtrust.org/about/dr-devra-davis/
Resume or CV:
Writing or Publications:
Website: https://ehtrust.org/
Video:
Socials:
Agency or agencies for which nominator feels nominee is best suited:
Organization name(s) and position(s) for which nominator feels nominee is best suited:
https://ehtrust.org/
Policies which the nominator knows the nominee supports or in which they have expertise:
The Environmental Health Trust (EHT) has been a vocal advocate for stricter radiofrequency (RF) emission standards in the United States, arguing that the current limits set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are outdated and insufficient to protect public health. The EHT’s primary contention is that the FCC’s standards, which were last updated in the 1990s, fail to account for the increasing evidence of potential health risks from chronic, low-level exposure to RF radiation, particularly with the proliferation of 4G and 5G technologies.
In recent legal actions, EHT has challenged the FCC’s adherence to its high permissible exposure limits, which are significantly more lenient than those in many other developed countries. EHT highlights that nations like Poland, Israel, Italy, and Belgium apply the precautionary principle in setting RF exposure limits. This principle involves erring on the side of caution by enforcing lower RF exposure levels to minimize potential health risks, particularly in sensitive areas such as schools, hospitals, and residential zones where people, especially children, may spend extended periods.
Countries adopting the precautionary principle set limits as low as 0.1 W/m² in certain areas—significantly lower than the FCC’s limits, which can go up to 10 W/m² for higher frequencies. EHT argues that the U.S. should align with these more conservative international standards, noting that evidence on the biological effects of RF radiation has evolved, suggesting possible risks to human health, including effects on cellular function, the brain, and potentially an increased risk of cancer.
EHT’s actions underscore a call for the FCC to review and potentially revise its RF emission guidelines in accordance with the latest scientific research and global best practices. By advocating for standards similar to those in the EU and other countries that embrace a cautious approach, EHT aims to ensure a safer environment as wireless infrastructure expands across the U.S.
Nominator's thoughts on what would make this nominee a valuable member of a future Trump Unity Government
he Environmental Health Trust (EHT), as an advocate for public health and safety, exemplifies multiple qualities essential for serving the public in a regulatory oversight role. The EHT has consistently demonstrated competence through its scientific research and deep understanding of radiofrequency (RF) safety standards, ensuring its positions are grounded in current science and international benchmarks.
EHT's integrity and honesty shine in its transparency about potential health risks associated with RF radiation, despite industry and establishment resistance. The Trust’s team has shown courage in challenging the FCC’s outdated standards, emphasizing the need for precaution and public health safeguards, even at the cost of facing significant institutional opposition.
EHT’s respectful approach to advocacy is evident in its reliance on rigorous scientific evidence, allowing for respectful engagement with regulatory bodies while still holding them accountable. Through its persistent efforts, EHT has demonstrated a proven record of advocating for science-based policies that align with the more conservative standards adopted in other developed countries. The Trust’s dedication to revising RF standards ensures that public health, especially for vulnerable populations, remains a priority, making EHT an exemplary candidate to serve the public effectively in any capacity dedicated to health and environmental safety.