Marianne Williamson

Peace at Home (Justice, Security, and Immigration)
, ,
1

Nominee's Key Links: 

Bio: 

Resume or CV: 

Writing or Publications: 

Website: 

Video: 

Socials: 

 

Agency or agencies for which nominator feels nominee is best suited:



  • Organization name(s) and position(s) for which nominator feels nominee is best suited: <strong

    Dept of Peace ( develop one )

     

    Policies which the nominator knows the nominee supports or in which they have expertise:

    Against forever wars. Wrote a Book - The Healing of America

     

    Nominator's thoughts on what would make this nominee a valuable member of a future Trump Unity Government

    1) Is Competent ...
    2) Is Honest...
    3) Is Respectful ...
    4) Has Integrity ...
    5) Has Courage ...
    6) Has a Proven Record...

    • 1 Like
    2

    She’s a Democrat against Republicans as far as her Facebook page states

    1 Like
    3

    Another nomination for Marianne:
    Writing or Publications: A Return to Love, A Course in Weight Loss, Illuminata: A Return to Prayer, The Law of Divine Compensation, A Year of Miracles, Woman’s Worth, The Shadow Effect, The Gift of Change, Illuminated Prayers, Everyday Grace, Tears to Triumph, A Politics of Love, Love and Awakening, The Age of Miracles, Enchanted Love, Healing the Soul of America, The Mystic Jesus: The Mind of Love

    Website: Www.marianne2024.com, Mariannewilliamson.substack.com

    Video: YouTube - many interviews, lectures, etc.

    Socials:

    Agency or agencies for which nominator feels nominee is best suited:

    • United States Institute of Peace

    • White House Office

    • Office of Government Ethics

    • Department of Education

    Organization name(s) and position(s) for which nominator feels nominee is best suited: Policies which the nominator knows the nominee supports or in which they have expertise: Nominator’s thoughts on what would make this nominee a valuable member of a future Trump Unity Government1) Is Competent …see her 2024 platform statements on marianne2024.com
    2) Is Honest…Her many talks and lectures and books reveal a person who has worked to become a role model of honesty on a personal as well as a social level.
    3) Is Respectful …just listen to her interviews with leading podcast hosts. Her communications exemplify respect for others, for the planet, for all of life.
    4) Has Integrity … she has brilliantly articulated through hard looks at our society and our politics that the way forward is through transformation on both the personal level as well as the societal level.
    5) Has Courage …she has led the way by encouraging others to become their best selves, and shown others how a mature, transparent vision for this country’s future can be shaped by courageous spiritual leaders who call others into greatness by service to the greater good.
    6) Has a Proven Record…Her commitment in the 1970’s to a major effort on behalf of aids sufferers demonstrated her willingness to serve others, a willingness which gives others a clear example of what a person can do when they see a need and respond with all their might to be of help.

    5 Likes
    4

    Personally know Marianne’s niece and this family is liberal, woke and disgusting. Do not nominate Marianne Williamson for the Trump team. Her niece transitioned and Groomed her daughter to be a boy. This family is on board with permanently castrating children.

    7 Likes
    5

    She seems like a nice enough person on the surface, but she has Trump Derangement Syndrome and would never accept a nomination from a Trump presidency. Not to mention there are better people to focus on safety at home than her.

    5 Likes
    7

    Its ok if she’s against Republicans. She can be pro US anyway.

    3 Likes
    8

    Fine, but she also demanded we send troops back into Afghanistan when Trump started pulling them out, because “protect the women”. Our presence in Afghanistan kept making Al Qaeda worse and worse, which is what was endangering Afghani women— they need us to use our charity organizations and humanitarian organizations, and diplomacy. Not keep funding different terrorist groups that are in competition with each other, then sending our own troops in and leaving a ton of our high tech weapons behind for terrorists to take when we withdraw our troops (like Biden did).

    Williamson supported Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal unconditionally, and criticized Trump for trying to withdraw from Afghanistan.

    She does not “love the American people” or even the people of the world. She’s a charlatan.

    9

    Marianne is a champion of peace and could do great things and spark important conversations if she is given this position. I nominate her.

    8 Likes
    10

    Here’s my experience with Marianne Williamson. Take it as you will.

    I met Marianne for the first and only time in the spring of 2020. In late 2019, shortly after MW declared her candidacy for POTUS I felt a calling and made a significant effort to connect with her campaign in order to volunteer. This led to a request from MW for me to host a campaign fundraising event, something I have never done. I put myself out, and together with family and extended friends, we hosted her in one of our homes raising significant funds on short notice. The event was a success. MW was gracious, well-spoken and seemed genuinely interested in us and our country.

    She went on to participate in the primary debates, make the rounds and speak publicly. She eventually dropped out of the race before super Tuesday (when my home state of Ohio votes.) I felt our mission with MW was fulfilled positively. We had helped amplify her message to millions. I eventually supported and voted for Tulsi Gabbard in the democratic primary, and overcame my own TDS and voted for Trump in the general election.

    Up to and following the election, I continued to be a leading social media contributor for Marianne. She was raising important discussions during COVID. She was also being marginalized, attacked and vilified by the apparatus especially within her own party. I did eventually question and push back publicly against her endorsement of Sanders and her ongoing preoccupation and vilification of Trump. Eventually, she, or her team blocked me. I felt betrayed. Although I have followed her sporadically and watched some appearances, we have not since communicated, nor have I spoken publicly nor supported her in any way.

    In my opinion, MW still holds significant animosity directed towards Donald Trump. That seems clear enough. She aligns closely with Bill Maher on this point. It limits her and clouds her judgment. I personally find it to be ugly and don’t care for her as a politician. However, liking or admiring Donald Trump are not prerequisites for effectively serving in the MAHA movement. (See Bobby Kennedy or Nicole Shanahan in early 2024 if you question this.)

    Marianne is ultimately guided by God. She respects life. She believes in capitalism (with a conscience), self-determination and bodily-autonomy. She loves this country and the Bill of Rights. She promotes diplomacy and global peace. Marianne is no friend to deception, to the military industrial complex, nor to the deep state. I have no doubt that she will fight diligently to restore our Republic and will uphold her oath to the Constitution. These are necessary qualifications for MAHA!

    Additionally, MW is especially gifted in a way that can help heal the mental health crisis and build a larger coalition. If she were to accept a call to serve in the MAHA administration, I feel confident that she would prove to be a very significant asset.

    6 Likes
    11

    I agree that people can change their minds about Trump and be welcomed into the fold if they want to get to work helping America. That is, after they’re willing to change their minds and at least stop calling Trump Hitler even if they disagree with Trump on a lot of things. I myself did not always like Trump from the beginning back in 2016. It took me time too, like Tulsi and RFK Jr.

    But to bring someone into the fold who hasn’t changed their minds and is still actively calling for lawfare against Trump, seems counterproductive.

    That, and she is certainly no staunch advocate against the military industrial complex. She demanded we send troops back to Afghanistan and shamed Trump supporters for being happy when Trump started withdrawing troops. She also shamed Code Pink and other anti-war feminists for wanting our troops to leave Afghanistan. Williamson’s reasoning was “the Taliban and Al Qaeda will oppress women” if we don’t keep a constant military occupation and cultural control over Afghanistan. Of course, never mind that living in a war zone where bombs are constantly being dropped is worse for women’s rights, children’s rights, and pregnant mothers. Worse than simply letting Afghanistan figure out their own post-war culture on their own.

    I don’t trust Marianne Williamson as far as I can throw her, after how she shamed people who wanted our troops to withdraw from Afghanistan during Trump’s presidency.

    1 Like
    12

    Thank you for your input. You bring up valid concerns.

    I have taken time to better familiarize myself with MW of late by watching interviews and listening to her speak. See here:

    With Jesse Waters yesterday:

    Her post election statement:

    With Kyra Phillips post election:

    With Dan Williams and Peter Navarro, Oct 25th:

    With John Roberts, August 23rd:

    With Neil Cavuto, July 22:

    On News Nation in May:

    I haven’t seen a single instance where she calls Trump (or anyone else) Hitler or Fascist, nor have I seen any evidence of her making those types of attacks or engaging in gas lighting, perpetuating the lies, false rhetoric, etc. If anyone has direct evidence of that, please bring the receipts. MW has suggested vigilance against fascism in the protection of democracy in a more idealistic sense, but I have not seen any evidence of that being directed specifically at groups or individuals. I didn’t know this already but MW never endorsed Kamala even though she eventually voted for her.

    I remain ignorant of her stance regarding Afghanistan and will take your word at face value. However, this seems to be more of a policy difference, not proof of support for the MIC. I actually respect her desire to protect Afghan women from Sharia law extremism,especially since we were already embedded in the country. That is a noble purpose even though I think Trump’s strategy of withdrawal was the correct path us. For MAHA, complete alignment on all issues is neither necessary nor preferred. As RFK, Jr has stated regarding their team of rivals, they aren’t going to agree on everything and they agree to respectfully disagree, even publicly.

    I think Marianne’s flaw, if it is a flaw, is that she still holds onto a vision of the Democratic party which no longer exists and cannot be restored. In hindsight, I think the party has been lost since before 2016. MW doesn’t see it this way, yet she has been consistent and loyal in her fight to expose corruption and attempts to restore the old vision of representing the working class. I find her character admirable.

    I’m still in support of MW being a part of MAHA, I think she can serve as a moral and ethical beacon for the country, and she can help those dealing with repressed anger and despair before that manifests into violence. All of this said, after becoming more familiar with her as of late, I think it’s more likely she continues to try and work within the Democratic party as opposed to joining the MAHA movement.

    5 Likes
    13

    Well I’ll agree with you on the matter that the Democrat party was lost before 2016. When I think about, I don’t think the Democrat party has had a sincerely well-meaning and unselfish President in office since JFK. Jimmy Carter was slightly more sincere than Clinton and Obama, but even he had his moments. The entire Democrat party was usurped by the deep state the minute JFK died.

    14

    There could be bipartisan cooperation in a Department of Peace, although the leader of such would be more suited to…

    Many who belong to Veteran’s For Peace

    David Swanson of World Beyond War (who recently won the Nobel prize for Peace

    Bruce Gagnon of The Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space

    And David Heartsough of Peaceworkers
    https://peaceworkersus.org/

    Inviting Williamson to this might have her and her family changing her mind about the aims of R.F. Kennedy Jr. (along with the millions of others who’ve been misled to believe the slander).

    If the upcoming administration creates such a Department and also enacts the Peace Tax Law for conscientious objector status on tax returns, that would be a significant step in the right direction and counterbalance the dominate the globe through militarism ideologues like Cheney who endorsed the party that lost. I go more into this in my proposal for the Establishment of an United States Department of Peace Establishment of a United States Department of Peace - Peace - Policies for the People

    1 Like
    15

    Sure, she can be against republicans (aka uniparty) but she’s also for socialist style programs. Shes a hard pass, a hell no. Shes not for the American Republic at all.

    16

    Marianne Williamson, Dem candidate for US President in 2020 and 2024, has been an advocate for a United States Department of Peace for the past 20+ years. She co-founded The Peace Alliance to support the first iteration of a bill for establishing a US Dept of Peace. (The Dept of Peace bill was introduced by ex-Dem now-Independent then-Congressman Dennis Kucinich, who was also Bobby Kennedy’s first campaign manager. The current bill, HR 1111, was introduced by Rep. Barbara Lee; Rep. Lee is leaving Congress after an unsuccessful bid for Senate.)

    Marianne is a quick learner, and is able to rethink and question her own views. So if she, like Nicole Shanahan, and so many of us MAHA supporters, can abandon TDS, then she would be a great appointment to create a United States Peace Academy, and/or as head of a cabinet-level Dept of Peace. Her humanistic, compassionate, political views are laid out in her book A Politics of Love: A Handbook for a New American Revolution. https://www.amazon.com/Politics-Love-Handbook-American-Revolution/dp/0062873938.

    Marianne is outspoken about corruption, including: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Oil, military-industrial, corporate money in politics. She has also been vilified and blackballed by the legacy media, and denied ballot access by the DNC. Running an Independent campaign for presidency was not an option for her. She continues to work towards reclaiming a functional Democratic Party with RFK’s and JFK’s values, but I imagine that strategy will eventually hit a dead end, as she is forced to reckon with reality. Worthwhile approaching her. Close to half a million people voted for Marianne in the Dem primaries.

    Marianne’s a lay person when it comes to health, not an expert like RFK Jr, yet her views are nuanced and she’s open to learning.

    Excerpts from Marianne’s latest Substack articles:

    AMERICA’S SICKNESS CARE SYSTEM: Robert Kennedy Jr. and our healthcare debate
    https://mariannewilliamson.substack.com/p/americas-sickness-care-system
    "I’ve been ringing the “We don’t have a healthcare system, we have a sickness care system!” bell for a long time. I mentioned in the [2020] debate that we have to ask why America has such a high rate of chronic illness compared to other countries, saying that in order to deal with that we’d have to look not only at Big Pharma but also at our chemical policies, environmental policies, food policies — and boy, check out how quickly Lester Holt got the camera off me at that point!

    Whether it’s Kennedy or me or anyone else, such a conversation is verboten in a system where Big Food, Big Pharma, big chemical companies and so forth have such undue influence on our public policies.

    And as we all know by now, anyone who goes there is a kook. . . . He has uttered extreme opinions that have made any reasonable person, including myself, suspicious of his positions at times.

    But I haven’t found one yet where his explanation, modification, or the evolution of his views has not quelled my suspicions. In fact, I’ve noticed how often it’s his accusers who will twist information, making something he said sound “crazy” when in fact in countries around the world the same point of view is considered anything but."

    TRUMP TAKES A HAMMER TO THE ESTABLISHMENT https://mariannewilliamson.substack.com/p/trump-takes-a-hammer-to-the-establishment
    “But I like a lot of the people I know who voted for [Trump], and I’ve come to understand in many cases why they did.” “I don’t care that Trump is taking a hammer to the machine. Democrats should have taken one to it long ago. Too many people who voted Democrat in the past feel they tried and tried. Now, in their despair, they are willing to try something else. I don’t agree with their political calculation, but I respect their yearning.”