Did you submit a nominee but do not see it listed yet? Here are a few possibilities:
Submissions DO NOT go directly into the website. They go into another database and are transferred once per day in the morning. All the submissions from the day before will appear at once in the daily information transfer. This is also why all posts are by “thenominator.”
IF IT HAS BEEN MORE THAN 24 HOURS and your post is still not showing, there are a few potential reasons:
Duplicate titles are not transferred. Please do a search for your nominee to see if they have already been nominated. Add your data as a reply to that post.
Moderators may have hidden your submission if little to no supporting data was added. If you submitted a form with few to no data points, please be more thorough when submitting again and add a #2 at the end of the person’s last name to avoid the duplication filter.
If there was derogatory content on your submission, it was removed.
You may have marked your submission private on the form, which will prevent it from appearing on the public site. Resubmit without making it private.
If none of the above is true and your nominee still is not showing up, please contact nominees@teamkennedy.com
This site, which is a MAHA Robert Kennedy, Jr., site is CENSORING in the name of . . . Kumbaya? RFKj clearly is not what he claims to be, chiefly against censorship. It’s okay if he’s the one doing it. Anyway, w/ the CENSORSHIP, our nominees NOT showing up and not trackable, and the general CONFUSION of the website which is rendering it unusable, yeah, you, me and I’m hearing comments from a lot of others are OUT OF HERE. It’s all a joke. CENSOR THAT!
Thank you. I nominated myself honestly and while I only did it today, I will at least be able to track myself. I hope I can garner some votes. Vote for Samuel Lawrence please.
This is a great comment. Each nominee should be weighed positively and negatively. I suggest that the word “derogatory” be changed to another word that fails to include civil comments about a candidate’s disqualifications, untrustworthiness, history, stated values, conflicts of interest, etc. One of the definitions of derogatory is “Tending to detract or diminish,” which I think is exactly what this site should cultivate. Conflicts of interest, like (1) holding stock in a pharmaceutical company,(2) having a grant from the NIH, NSF or CDC, and/or (3) being an employee of a NIH agency or a company receiving grants from the NIH, should be disclosed. Non-disclosure of conflicts of interest has been a pattern of the NIAID and FDA, and suppressing disclosure of such conflicts of interest in this forum should not be policy or action. Censorship by Facebook, Google, etc. for c@v!d “misinformation” should not be an example for this forum to follow. In other words, is my above comment about failures of conflict-of-interest disclosures by the NIAID and FDA in any way derogatory? Think about it.