Thank you for this rare opportunity to add a single observation which does not get nearly enough attention.
School board elections give public schools the appearance of legitimacy through accountability, but this is a trap. The conventional wisdom is that if you want change, you should get involved and run for school board. However, this line of reasoning is flawed.
In reality, the ability for union-controlled schools to course-correct was lost in the 1970s and 1980s when discretionary authority was eliminated in public education. This is because employment cannot be left to the whims of elections. The only way out of this catch-22 is to eliminate political control of school governance, which can be achieved through parental choice.
In the US, locally elected school boards have existed for generations. However, since the 1970s and the rise of teacher unions, while the “form” of the institution has not changed, their “function” is different. School boards promote the idea that public accountability is possible. Instead, they systematically protect the insitution from accountability by laundering teacher union control.
Teacher union contracts and state laws put in place decades ago, tie the hands of administrators too tightly. School board directors are practically impotent. These contracts and laws also form the structural foundation of teacher union power, such as payroll deduction, control of school communications, on-site stewards. Since George Floyd especially, we have seen what this machine is doing to and with students. Who marched with their striking teachers as a child? I did.
This machine (in RTW states as well) cannot practically be opposed by lay-leaders running for school boards. The power asymmetry is too great. School directors running on “reform” platforms find themselves both ineffective and recalled.
Educating children is challenging enough without teacher union contracts and management alignment with employees, and local attendance monopolies. Children and families, especially those from low-income backgrounds, cannot rely on a superhero to overcome this unacknowledged, systematic, and structural power imbalance.
Here’s the catch-22. If you have political control of public schools, you need teacher union influence in elections to protect employees from capricious actors. They exist because of political control over hiring and firing at schools. Teacher unions are creatures of this institution. And now that they are masters of local elections, they are desperate to preserve poolitical control of schools.
It is time to end this charade and recognize the limitations of school boards in effecting meaningful change in public education.
I hope that candidates for this administration will not fall for the logical fallacy that stronger school boards can improve public education. Only school choice can.